Legal Opinion

Seaton v. Plasti-Mat, Inc.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 28, 1992No. 70477PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMMS, Justice:

The issue on review is whether the Claimant’s workers’ compensation claim for a job related injury was time barred?

Gary Wayne Seaton, Claimant, was injured on October 21, 1976, in a job related accident. A forklift he was standing on accidentally crushed him against a wall when his foot slipped off the pallet and caused the forks to engage. The employer, Plasti-Mat, (respondent) had Seaton taken to a hospital by ambulance where he was treated for two days and released. Subsequently, claimant returned to work and resumed normal activity.

The claimant’s medical expense for the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McDonald v. Time-DC, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. Hackler v. Speed Parts WarehouseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Camps v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  2. Smith v. Matrix Service Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2001
  3. Ramsey v. WeyerhaeuserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  4. Camps v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  5. Seaton v. Plasti-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API