Legal Opinion

Marchuk v. Ralphs Grocery Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 24, 1990No. G008653PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CROSBY, J.

Frank Marchuk challenges the postarbitration dismissal of his tort action for failure to bring it to trial within six months after he filed a request for trial de novo. We agree he was not diligent in securing a timely trial date and affirm.

I

This matter remained submitted to judicial arbitration more than four years and six months after it was initiated. Marchuk timely filed a request for trial de novo on January 20, 1989. Accordingly, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 583.350, he had six months from that date, 1 i.e., until July 21, 1989, to bring the action to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Moran v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Crown Coach Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Hill v. BinghamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. Santa Monica Hospital Medical Center v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. Baccus v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Howard v. Thrifty Drug & Discount StoresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Messih v. LevineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Howard v. Thrifty Drug & Discount StoresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Messih v. LevineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API