Legal Opinion
Maine Unemployment Compensation Commission v. Androscoggin Junior, Inc.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided November 7, 1940PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHudson, J.
On report. These three actions, based on Sec. 14(b) of the Maine Unemployment Compensation Law (P. L. 1935, Chap. 192, as amended), were brought for the purpose of collecting unemployment contributions. It is stipulated that in each due notice was given and payment demanded.
The Healy Cases
For many years before 1936, Mr. Healy owned and operated a boys’ camp known as Camp Androscoggin..That year he and two of his camp counsellors organized a corporation known as Androscoggin Junior, Inc., for the purpose of creating and operating a separate camp for younger boys. Mr. Healy was to continue to *156ca…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Madden v. Kentucky Ex Rel. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Minneapolis Civic & Commerce Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- United States v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Howes Bros. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Zelney v. MurphyIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
- New Haven Metal & Heating Supply Co. v. DanaherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Shapiro Bros. Shoe Co. v. Lewiston-Auburn Shoeworkers Protective Ass'nSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
- Zehender & Factor, Inc. v. MurphyIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
- Godsol v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.