Legal Opinion

Southgate Bank and Trust Co. v. May

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 20, 1985No. WD 35874PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NUGENT, Judge.

Defendant Billy J. May appeals from a deficiency judgment in favor of plaintiff Southgate Bank and Trust Company based upon a promissory note and security agreement. The bank sold defendant’s repossessed collateral, a pickup truck. The defendant claims that the bank sold the truck while negotiations for its redemption between the parties’ attorneys were continuing. He argues that the bank did not give him reasonable notice of its intent to sell the collateral and, therefore, the bank is estopped to assert a claim for a deficiency. We agree and reverse.

In 1979, defendant, Charles…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Schroeder Ex Rel. Schroeder v. HorackSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  3. Peerless Supply Co. v. Industrial Plumbing & Heating Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  4. Jones v. LinderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  5. Brooks v. CookseySupreme Court of Missouri · 1968

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Gum v. DudleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Miller v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  3. Bremen Bank & Trust Co. of St. Louis v. MuskopfMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Southern Cross Lumber & Millwork Co. v. BeckerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Landmark Bank v. First National Bank in MadisonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API