Legal Opinion

In re Cincinnati Policing

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided August 5, 2002No. C-1-99-3170PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DLOTT, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on the joint motion of all parties for class certification and approval of the Collaborative Agreement as settlement of the class claims asserted in this lawsuit. The Court GRANTS the motion.

*397I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Bomani Tyehimba filed suit in this Court on April 30, 1999 against the City of Cincinnati and two police officers, in both their individual and official capacities. On December 13, 2000, he moved the Court for leave to file an amended complaint. The Court granted him leave, but instead of filing an amended…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Floyd v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  2. IUE-CWA v. General Motors Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2006
  3. Leonhardt v. ArvinMeritor, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008
  4. Floyd v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  5. New England Health Care Employees Pension Fund v. Fruit of the Loom, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API