Legal Opinion
Weisberger v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 27, 1939No. Appeal, 241PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Stadtfeld, J.,
The appellants in this case were, by complaint of L. M. Scholl, charged with operating as a common carrier without having a certificate of public convenience. This complaint was answered separately by the three respondents.
Max Weisberger denied common carriage but admitted owning a dairy and hauling milk from the farmers from whom it was purchased to his dairy, for which purpose he employed Herman Weisberger, one of the other respondents. He further admitted charging back to the farmers the cost of transportation in accordance with the regulations of the Milk Control…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Frost & Frost Trucking Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Michigan Public Utilities Commission v. DukeSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Producers Transportation Co. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- The Pipe Line CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Lloyd v. HaughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Merchants Parcel Delivery, Inc. v. Pa. Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Allaman v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Philadelphia Ass'n of Wholesale Opticians v. Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Protective Motor Service Co. v. P.U.C.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth v. BenciPike County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.