Legal Opinion

McIlhenny v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 4, 1930No. 4077PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, District Judge.

John D. Mellhenny filed an income tax return for the year 1920, in which he claimed a deduction for loss of $4,749.42. Early in 1923, a revenue agent examined his return and disallowed the deduction. Mellhenny filed a protest. In February of 1924 the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, after giving consideration to the report of the revenue agent and the taxpayer’s protest, expressly allowed the deduction in full. Other adjustments in the return, however, resulted in a determination of a deficiency and an assessment of an additional tax which Mcllhenny duly paid in full.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Botany Worsted Mills v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Woodworth v. KalesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1928
  3. Austin Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929
  4. L. Loewy & Son v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  5. Holmquist v. BlairCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Pierre Boulez v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
  2. Boulez v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1981
  3. Fruehauf Trailer Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1964
  4. Hudock v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1975
  5. La Societe Francaise De Bienfaisance Mutuelle v. California EmploymentCommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API