Legal Opinion

Pierre Boulez v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 13, 1987No. 19-5353PublishedCited by 109 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPOTTSWOOD W. ROBINSON, III, Circuit Judge:

This appeal summons us to adjudge the validity of an oral agreement between a taxpayer and an official of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) purporting to compromise a disputed income tax liability. The United States Tax Court held the agreement ineffective on the ground that the official lacked authority to enter into it. 1 We affirm.

I

The taxpayer, Pierre Boulez, is a citizen of France and a world-renowned music director and conductor. 2 In 1971, Boulez contracted with Beacon Concerts, Ltd., a United Kingdom corporation, 3 to serve as director and…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Commissioner v. South Texas Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Botany Worsted Mills v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Schweiker v. HansenSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. United States v. CorrellSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by109 opinions

  1. Harold M. Reynolds v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  2. Woods v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989
  3. Kronish v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1988
  4. Norfolk Southern Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1995
  5. United States v. Robert Asmar and Kathleen AsmarCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987

104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API