Legal Opinion

L. Loewy & Son v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 1, 1929No. 239PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAugustus N. Hand, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). The questions involved on this appeal are:(1) Whether the taxpayer and the Commissioner reached an agreement fixing the amount of the tax which, when followed by payment, constituted an accord and satisfaction, or an estoppel, and barred the assessment and collection of additional taxes.(2) Whether or not the assessment and collection of any deficiency in taxes for the fiscal years was barred by the statute of limitation.

The first question seems to have been answered by the Supreme Court in Botany Worsted Mills v. United States, 49 S. Ct. 129, 73 L. Ed.-.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Botany Worsted Mills v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Woodworth v. KalesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1928
  3. Loewer Realty Co. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Royal Indemnity Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Joyce v. GentschCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
  3. McIlhenny v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1930
  4. First National Bank of Montgomery v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1959
  5. Estate of Meyer v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API