Keen v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.
The claimant workman was employed by a partnership at a garage as an acetylene welder and automobile mechanic, at a stated-salary per week and so much per hour for extra work in the automobile line outside of welding. While he was engaged in the work of his employment and was asking instructions from one of his employers with reference to a job in the shop, a customer talking with this employer, and, -so far as indicated, without altercation or provocation other than because of irritation at the refusal of the employer to do, without *258further charge, additional work on a car, under a bill…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McNicol's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Georgia Casualty Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Pinkerton National Detective Agency v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Pinkerton National Detective Agency v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
3Cited by25 opinions
- Employers Liability Assurance Corp. v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- United States Casualty Co. v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- General Fire & Casualty Co. v. BellflowerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. HoneaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. HoageCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.