Legal Opinion

Southgate Development Corp. v. Columbia Gas Transmission Corp.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1976No. 76-299PublishedCited by 131 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaul W. Brown, J.

On its face, Civ. R. 12(B)(1) would appear to require that a motion to dismiss a complaint for reason of lack of jurisdiction of the court over the subject matter should be determined from the face of the complaint. Such a conclusion would be buttressed by observing that when a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted presents matters outside the pleadings, Civ. R. 12(B) (6) specifically authorizes that the motion may be treated as a motion for summary judgment and disposed of as provided in Civ. R. 56.

Federal practice relevant to Ohio Civ. R. 12(B)(1),…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Public Util. Comm'n of Ohio v. United Fuel Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. State of Alabama Ex Rel. William J. Baxley, Attorney General v. Arthur D. Woody, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973

3Cited by131 opinions

  1. Nemazee v. Mt. Sinai Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Ford v. Tandy Transportation, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Guillory v. Dept. of Rehab. Corr., 07ap-861 (5-8-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Milligan v. Ohio Bell Telephone Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Shockey v. FoutyOhio Court of Appeals · 1995

126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API