Southgate Development Corp. v. Columbia Gas Transmission Corp.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPaul W. Brown, J.
On its face, Civ. R. 12(B)(1) would appear to require that a motion to dismiss a complaint for reason of lack of jurisdiction of the court over the subject matter should be determined from the face of the complaint. Such a conclusion would be buttressed by observing that when a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted presents matters outside the pleadings, Civ. R. 12(B) (6) specifically authorizes that the motion may be treated as a motion for summary judgment and disposed of as provided in Civ. R. 56.
Federal practice relevant to Ohio Civ. R. 12(B)(1),…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Public Util. Comm'n of Ohio v. United Fuel Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- State of Alabama Ex Rel. William J. Baxley, Attorney General v. Arthur D. Woody, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
3Cited by131 opinions
- Nemazee v. Mt. Sinai Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Ford v. Tandy Transportation, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Guillory v. Dept. of Rehab. Corr., 07ap-861 (5-8-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Milligan v. Ohio Bell Telephone Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Shockey v. FoutyOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.