Legal Opinion

Blum v. Goldman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 19, 1951No. Appeal, 228PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Chidsey,

Frank Blum and Sara J. Blum, appellants, instituted this action in trespass against William Goldman, appellee, to recover damages for malicious inducement to, breach a contract for the sale of real estate. Two previous cases had been instituted by the present appellants against William Goldman Theatres, Inc., based upon the same transaction which gave rise to the present case, and in which William Goldman was named as president, principal stockholder and agent. The instant complaint pleaded the earlier litigation and incorporated the record thereof by reference.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wallace's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Bausewine v. Norristown Herald, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Jones v. CostlowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  4. Blum v. William Goldman Theatres, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
  5. Blum v. William Goldman Theatres, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mamalis v. Atlas Van Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Mamalis v. Atlas Van Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Goldstein v. AhrensSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. Fleming v. StrayerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Toogood v. RogalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API