Legal Opinion

Toogood v. Rogal

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 15, 2000PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McEWEN, President Judge:

¶ 1 These consolidated appeals have been taken from the judgment entered, in this medical malpractice action, following the dismissal of the post-verdict motions filed by appellants, Owen J. Rogal, D.D.S., and Owen J. Rogal, D.D.S., P.C. (hereinafter “the Rogal appellants”) and Thomas Stone, as executor of the estate of Hrant Stone (hereinafter “appellant Stone”). As we find that the trial court properly rejected the arguments of appellants, we affirm the judgment in the amount of $465,000 entered in favor of appellee, Kevin Too-good, and against the Rogal appellants.

¶…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Feingold v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Miller v. Brass Rail Tavern, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Mitzelfelt v. KamrinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Hightower-Warren v. SilkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Brannan v. Lankenau HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Toogood v. RogalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Corrado v. Thomas Jefferson University HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Bennyhoff v. PappertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Smith v. Paoli Memorial HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Goldberg Ex Rel. Goldberg v. IsdanerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API