Legal Opinion
Blum v. William Goldman Theatres, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 3, 1949No. 9663PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIGGS, Chief Judge.
The suit at bar is but one ramification of a long, drawn out dispute between the parties. Frank and Sara J. Blum (“Blum”) have brought this action seeking damages from William Goldman Theatres, Inc. (“Goldman”) for maliciously inducing the trustees of an estate to breach a contract to convey certain property to Blum. The court below dismissed the complaint under the doctrine of res judicata. Blum has appealed.
For the purpose of this opinion we need not relate in detail the facts leading to a prior suit between the same parties at No. 5524 in the court below. These were set…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hartmann v. Time, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Wallace's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Hochman v. Mortgage Finance Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Smith v. Equitable Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- Blum v. William Goldman Theatres, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Aerojet-General Corp. v. AskewCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Mercado Riera v. Mercado RieraSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1972
- Stark Ritchie v. Ralph LandauCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- E. Howard Hunt, Jr. v. Liberty Lobby, IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Lucius J. Breeland v. Security Insurance Company of New Haven, ConnecticutCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.