Legal Opinion

Dixon / Frohnmayer v. Rosenblum

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 2014No. S062043; S062046PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

Petitioners seek review of the ballot title for Initiative Petition 38 (2014) (IP 38), arguing that the ballot title does not satisfy the requirements of ORS 250.035(2). We review a certified ballot title to determine whether it substantially complies with those statutory requirements. ORS 250.085(5). For the reasons that follow, we refer the ballot title to the Attorney General for modification.

IP 38, if adopted, would alter the Oregon primary election process for certain partisan offices, denominated “voter choice offices.” Those offices are United States Senator, Congressional…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kain/Waller v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Reynolds v. SchrockOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Kain v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Lavey v. KrogerOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Caruthers v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kendoll v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Hopkins/Starrett v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Kendoll v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API