Legal Opinion

Mahnkey v. Bolger

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 26, 1950No. Civ. 14360PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOTTKY, J. pro tem.

The plaintiffs, Elsie C. and William O. Mahnkey, husband and wife, filed an action against Phillip Bolger to recover damages for personal injuries to Mr. Mahnkey and damages to the automobile of Mrs. Mahnkey resulting from a collision with the automobile of defendant Bolger. The latter denied any negligence on his part, set up the defense of contributory negligence on plaintiffs’ part, and also filed a cross-complaint seeking damages. The jury returned a verdict against defendant and in favor of plaintiff William Mahnkey for $6,650, and in favor of Mrs. Mahnkey for $850,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anthony v. HobbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Girdner v. Union Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Citti v. BavaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Wallis v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Poncino v. Reid-Murdock & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. BrandtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Brautigam v. BrooksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Hart v. WieltCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Sweeney v. PozarelliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Crawford v. AliotoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API