Wiener v. American Insurance
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 181, Jan. T., 1908, by Phoenix Insurance Company Garnishee, from order of C. P. No. 2, Phila. Co., Dec. T., 1906, No. 30, making absolute rule for judgment against garnishee on answers in case of Louis Wiener to use of J. R. Pringle v. The American Insurance Company of Boston, defendant, and Phoenix Insurance Company Garnishee. Foreign attachment. Rule on garnishee for judgment on answers. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the case.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 181, Jan. T., 1908, by Phoenix Insurance Company Garnishee, from order of C. P. No. 2, Phila. Co., Dec. T., 1906, No. 30, making absolute rule for judgment against garnishee on answers in case of Louis Wiener to use of J. R. Pringle v. The American Insurance Company of Boston, defendant, and Phoenix Insurance Company Garnishee. Foreign attachment. Rule on garnishee for judgment on answers. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the case. Error assigned was order making absolute rule for judgment.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Brown,
This foreign attachment was issued against the American Insurance Company of Boston, a Massachusetts corporation, as defendant, and the Phcenix Insurance Company of New York, a New York corporation, as garnishee. The defendant. appeared and judgment was entered against it for want of a suf*294ficient affidavit of defense. Subsequently judgment was entered against the garnishee on its answers to the interrogatories filed, and from that judgment it has appealed. What was attached was a debt due from the garnishee to the defendant in the attachment, and we are asked to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Harris v. BalkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Blackstone v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. PennockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1866
- Fithian v. New York & Erie RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1857
3Cited by10 opinions
- Parker, Peebles & Knox v. El SaiehSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Bianco v. Concepts" 100", Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Bingenheimer Mercantile Co. v. WeberNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
- FinanceAmerica Credit Corp. v. Kruse Classic Auction Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
- Falk Co. v. American Railway Express Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.