Legal Opinion
Bradley v. Harris Research, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 28, 2001No. 00-16021PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:
Harris Research, Inc. (“HRI”) appeals an order of the district court denying its motion for summary judgment, dismissing the case, and ordering the parties to participate in private arbitration. A franchise agreement between HRI and Appellees Michael and Patricia Bradley provided for arbitration of disputes to take place in Utah. HRI contends that the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA” or “Act”) preempts Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 20040.5, the California statute on which the district court relied to compel arbitration in California, rather than in Utah. We have jurisdiction…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Connie A. Nagrampa v. Mailcoups, Inc. The American Arbitration AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Sakkab v. Luxottica Retail North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Cape Flattery Limited v. Titan Maritime, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Wisconsin Auto Title Loans, Inc. v. JonesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- Lowden v. T-MOBILE USA, INC.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.