Legal Opinion

Skolnick v. Skolnick

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 7, 1945PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDickenson, J.

The plaintiff, wife of the defendant Harry Skolnick, brought this action to foreclose a mortgage which had been given by him and his father, the defendant Louis Skolnick, on property they owned jointly, and which she claims to have acquired by gift from her husband. Louis appeals from the judgment for the plaintiff upon the ground that there was no completed gift of the note and mortgage from Harry to the plaintiff; that the transaction was illegally designed to defeat his interest and that of subsequent mortgagees; and that the purchase of the mortgage inured to his benefit as cotenant.

Louis…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ward v. WardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
  2. Gest v. GestSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  3. Robinson v. LewisMississippi Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Second National Bank of New Haven v. DyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
  5. Austin v. BarrettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance v. Mutual Communications Associates, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance v. Mutual Communications Associates, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API