Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Cofield

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 10, 1929No. 8 Div. 65PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

■GARDNER, J.

The appeal is from a decree sustaining a demurrer to the bill as amended. The sole assignment of error is the rendition of this decree, and the argument of counsel, in substance, is but a repetition of the assignment of error. This does not ■“reach the dignity of an insistence” thereon, and, under the uniform decisions of this court, the assignment must be considered as waived. Republic Iron & Steel Co. v. Quinton, 194 Ala. 126, 69 So. 604; Ogburn-Griffin Gro. Co. v. Orient Ins. Co., 188 Ala. 218, 66 So. 434; Stover v. Hill, 208 Ala. 575, 94 So. 826; Cairnes v. Hillman Drug Co.,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. HollandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. Republic Iron & Steel Co. v. QuintonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  3. Cairnes v. Hillman Drug Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  4. Ogburn-Griffin Gro. Co. v. Orient InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  5. Stover v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McDavid v. United Mercantile Agencies, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  2. Coffee County v. ParrishSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  3. Edwards v. TabbSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  4. Hopwood v. BennettAlabama Court of Appeals · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API