Legal Opinion
Bd. of Cty. Com'rs of Tulsa v. Tulsa Camera Record
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 18, 1924No. 13631PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
STEPHENSON, C.
The plaintiff commenced its action against the board of county commissioners by filing a claim for supplies and services claimed to have been performed for the county clerk, which was denied and appealed to tlhe district court by the plaintiff. In the trial of the cause judgment went for the plaintiff on motion of the latter. The defendant has appealed the cause to this court, and for error alleges that the judgment is not supported by sufficient evidence and is contrary to law.
The plaintiff was engaged in the business of photographing the original instrument into…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Smart v. Board of County Com'rs of Craig CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- State ex rel. Reed v. Commissioners of Marion CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1879
- Courtney v. BarnettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- State Ex Rel. Board of Educ. of Oklahoma City v. WestSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Board of Com'rs of Washita County v. BrettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Boardman Co. v. Board of Com'rs, Ellis Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- United States Rubber Co. v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Board of Com'rs v. Enid Springs Sanitarium & HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Western Paint & Chemical Co. v. Board of Com'rsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- News-Dispatch Printing & Audit Co. v. Board of Com'rs of LeFlore CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.