Legal Opinion
Brown v. Sacher
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 6, 1943PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIFKIND, District Judge.
After oral argument upon the application of the Office of Price Administration for a temporary injunction, the only question left open for decision was the scope of the order. The application was made upon the complaint and affidavits which showed that defendants were dealers in furs, skins and peltries; that since May 11, 1942, there has been in effect, with respect to defendant, General Maximum Price Regulation (7 Fed.Reg., 3153, et seq.), issued pursuant to the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 901 et seq.; that pursuant to Section…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Express Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Henderson v. BurdCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- National Labor Relations Board v. Standard Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bowles v. SacherCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Bowles v. LeitholdCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
- Bowles v. HudspethDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1945
- Bowles v. LeitholdDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1945
- Bowles v. W. T. Grant Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.