Legal Opinion
Larry P. v. Riles
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 20, 1972No. C-71 2270PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER and MEMORANDUM
PECKHAM, District Judge.
Plaintiffs in this case have asked the Court to issue a preliminary injunction restraining the San Francisco Unified School District from administering I.Q. tests for purposes of determining whether to place black students in classes for the educable mentally retarded. Named plaintiffs, who remain anonymous for their own protection, are black San Francisco elementary school children who have been placed in EMR (Educable Mentally Retarded) classes because, inter alia, they scored below 75 on the defendant School District’s I.Q. tests. They claim that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Hobson Ex Rel. Hobson v. HansenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Smith v. Alameda County Social Services AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Lora v. Board of Ed. of City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1978
- Larry P. v. RilesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Wendy Berkelman, Through Pearl Berkelman, Her Next Friend and Natural Guardian v. San Francisco Unified School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Larry P. v. RilesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.