Legal Opinion

Larry P. v. Riles

District Court, N.D. California

Decided October 16, 1979No. C-71-2270 RFPPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PECKHAM, Chief Judge.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SUMMARY 932 OPINION 933 I. The Parties 933 II. Procedural Background 933 III. History of the I.Q. Test and of Special Education in California 935 A. The Early History 935 B. State Funded Programs for the Educable Mentally Retarded:' Statutory History 937 C. Special Classes for the Educable Mentally Retarded 941 D. The Racial Composition of E.M.R. Classes . 942 E. The Use of I.Q. Tests in E.M.R. Placement 945 1. The State Requirement of an I.Q. Test 945 2. The I.Q. Score and the Other Psychological Data for E.M.R. Placement' 948 3. The Moratorium on I.Q.…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Georgia State Conference of Branches of Naacp, Mary Alice Covin, Mary Laurant, Sylvia Dennis, and Naomi Tucker v. State of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  2. Crawford v. HonigCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  3. Pushkin v. Regents of the University of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
  4. Fairchild v. LockhartDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1989
  5. Larry P. v. RilesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API