Smith v. Alameda County Social Services Agency
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BRUNN, J. *
In this case we undertake the delicate and difficult task of deciding whether or not to fashion a new cause of action. Appellant, in an able brief, states the underlying question: “The principal issue raised by this appeal is whether a county social services agency which has been entrusted with the sole responsibility for finding an infant an adoptive home may be held liable [for damages] if that agency negligently fails to carry out its responsibilities.”
Our discussion will be in three parts. We will first summarize the factual and procedural setting. Next, we will examine…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Johnson v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Hobson Ex Rel. Hobson v. HansenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1967
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Davidson v. City of WestminsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Thompson v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Kevin Ross v. Creighton UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Peterson v. San Francisco Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Parsons v. Crown Disposal Co.California Supreme Court · 1997
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.