Legal Opinion

Flower v. Detroit

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 14, 1888No. 203PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. In equity, for the infringement of letters patent. Decree dismissing the bill. Complainants appealed. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

.Mr. Justice Blatchford

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a suit, in equity, brought in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Michigan, by James Flower, Thomas Flower, and George Flower, against the City of Detroit, the Fire Commission of the City of Detroit, Benjamin Yernon, president thereof, and the Board of Water Commissioners of the City of Detroit, for the infringement of reissued letters patent No. 6990, granted March 14, 1876, on an application filed February 17, 1876, to Thomas B. Bailey, Jr., for an “ improvement in hydrants,” the original…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Parker & Whipple Co. v. Yale Clock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Hoskin v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Mathews v. MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. U. S. Industrial Chemicals, Inc. v. Carbide & Carbon Chemicals Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. American Automotoneer Co. v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
  3. Freeman v. AsmusSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Grier Bros. v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1915
  5. Featherstone v. George R. Bidwell Cycle Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API