Legal Opinion

Featherstone v. George R. Bidwell Cycle Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 1, 1893PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. In Equity. Bill by Alfred Featherstone against the George R. •Bidwell Cycle Company for infringement of letters patent. The circuit court rendered a decree for complainant. 53 Fed. Rep. 113. Respondent appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACE, Circuit Judge.

By the decree of the circuit court, it was adjudged that the fourth claim of the reissued patent Flo. 11,153, granted to John Boyd Dunlop for an improved wheel tire for cycles, was valid, and had been infringed by the defendant. The defendant contended, and now insists, that the fourth claim of the reissue is void, because it is for a different invention than that covered by the original patent to Dunlop, and because the original patent was surrendered, and the reissue obtained, not to correct a mistake, but merely for the purpose of securing by that claim a patent for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mahn v. HarwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Parker & Whipple Co. v. Yale Clock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Hoskin v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Pattee Plow Co. v. KingmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  5. Flower v. DetroitSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Westinghouse v. New York Air-Brake Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1893
  2. Toledo Computing Scale Co. v. Moneyweight Scale Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1910
  3. Brown & Bigelow v. Louis F. Dow Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
  4. Weston Electrical Instrument Co. v. StevensCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API