Legal Opinion

Guay v. Brotherhood Building Ass'n

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 1, 1935PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPage, J.

The first exception of the defendants is to the refusal of the master to consider, as an element of damages resulting from the premature foreclosure, the difference between the price at which the property was bid in at the foreclosure sale and the amount then due on the first mortgage lien. They rely upon the general statement (41 C. J. 1036) that when a mortgagee makes a premature or unauthorized sale upon foreclosure he is liable to the mortgagor for the value of the land at the time of sale, less the amount of the prior mortgage debt.

An examination of the American cases cited to sustain…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Warren v. . SusmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  2. Missouri Real Estate Syndicate v. SimsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Harkeem v. AdamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  2. State Ex Rel. MacRi v. City of BremertonWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Keenan v. FearonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  4. Dempere v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  5. Rogerson Hiller Corp. v. Port of Port AngelesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API