Legal Opinion

Marriott Bros. v. Gage

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided October 7, 1988No. Civ. A. CA 3-86-0335-GPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

FISH, District Judge.

This case is before the court on the amended motion for summary judgment of defendants Collins, Harnage, and Mega Resources (“the Collins defendants”). 1 By order of May 13, 1988, the court stayed its consideration of the motion for summary judgment until the plaintiffs had filed a RICO case statement. After considering the motion and response, and the RICO statement and responses, the court concludes that plaintiffs have no meritorious RICO claim against the defendants. Accordingly, defendants are entitled to judgment on this claim as a matter of law.…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Thigpen v. LockeTexas Supreme Court · 1962

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Castillo v. First City Bancorporation of Texas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  2. Firestone v. GalbreathDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1990
  3. Allstate Insurance Co. v. BenhamouDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2016
  4. Ranieri v. Advocare Int'l, L.P.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2018
  5. Bonton v. Archer Chrysler Plymouth, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API