Legal Opinion

Andrews v. Bloom

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 23, 1930PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Appellee recovered judgment for personal injuries and for damages to his automobile, resulting from a collision -with, the automobile which he was driving with one owned by appellant. There ivas a conflict in the testimony as to whose negligence caused the injury, but that question was submitted to the jury under instructions conceded to be correct,, and has been settled by the verdict of the jury.

Another question in the case arises out of testimony about which there is no substantial conflict. It is to the following effect. Mr. Will Ragsdale owns and operates a garage in the city of Helena,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. RahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Healey v. CockrillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  3. Terry Dairy Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  4. Janik v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Samuelian v. American Tool & Machine Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Casteel v. Yantis-Harper Tire CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  2. Casteel v. Yantis-Harper Tire CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  3. Johnson Ex Rel. Johnson v. SelindhSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
  4. Conant v. GiddingsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1940
  5. Reynolds v. BoundsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API