Terry Dairy Co. v. Parker
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Prairie Circuit Court, Southern District ; G. W. Clark, Judge; 1. There was no proper service on the appellant, a corporation organized and doing business under the laws of Arkansas. The case in 115 Ark. 272, is not in point. The motion to quash the service should have been sustained, as the court obtained no jurisdiction.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Prairie Circuit Court, Southern District ; G. W. Clark, Judge; 1. There was no proper service on the appellant, a corporation organized and doing business under the laws of Arkansas. The case in 115 Ark. 272, is not in point. The motion to quash the service should have been sustained, as the court obtained no jurisdiction. The pretended service was upon a person who had no contract with appellant and was not in charge of any branch of appellant’s business; his only duty was to take milk from the farmers, weigh and ship it to- appellant at Little Eock. He was not an agent of…
1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the appellee against the appellant.
The appellee filed a complaint in the Prairie Circuit Court against the appellant in which the appellee alleged, among other things, that the appellant was a corporation of the State of Arkansas, 'having its domicile and principal office and place of business in Little Rock, Arkansas; that it also keeps a place of business in the Southern District of Prairie County, Arkansas; that it uses automobile trucks to transport its products; that on May 23,1919, the appellee was walking north along the west side of Main…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Singer Manufacturing Co. v. RahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Ferris v. . SterlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. GillihanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
- Nyback v. Champagne Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1901
- Fort Smith Lumber Co. v. ShacklefordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Matter of Glielmi v. Netherland Dairy Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Birmingham Post Co. v. SturgeonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- James v. Tobin-Sutton Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- Mullins v. Ritchie Grocer CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
- Arkansas Baking Company v. WymanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.