Casteel v. Yantis-Harper Tire Company
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtButler, J.
In the trial of this cause in the court below a verdict was returned under the direction of the court against appellant, the plaintiff, in favor of the defendants, Yantis-Harper Tire Company, and, when that action was taken, a nonsuit was entered against their co-defendant, Robert Tolliver. We are therefore required by settled rules of practice to view the testimony on plaintiff’s behalf, with the inferences properly dedueible therefrom, in the light most favorable to her in the determination of the correctness of the court’s ruling in directing a verdict in favor of the tire compány. The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Skillern v. BakerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
- Hunter v. First State Bank of MorriltonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
- River, Rail & Harbor Construction Co. v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. of N.Y. v. RaymondSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
- Andrews v. BloomSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Golenternek v. KurthSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
- Arkansas Baking Company v. WymanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
- Pekin Wood Products Co. v. MasonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
- Ford & Son Sanitary Co. v. RansomSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
- Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. v. TrotterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.