Legal Opinion

Shawmut Community Bank, N.A. v. Zagami

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 20, 1994PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAbrams, J.

After our decision in Shawmut Community Bank, N.A. v. Zagami, 411 Mass. 807 (1992), the question arose as to the appropriate date from which postjudgment interest should run on the judgment on the defendant’s counterclaims. The defendant in counterclaim, Shawmut Commu*221nity Bank, N.A. (Shawmut), claimed that the appropriate date was September 1, 1988, the date final judgment entered. Zagami claimed postjudgment interest should be computed from September 2, 1986, the date the jury verdict on the common law fraud claim was returned. A judge in the Superior Court agreed with Shawmut and ordered…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Borman v. BormanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  3. Yorke Management v. CastroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  4. James Turner, and Cross-Appellee v. Japan Lines, Ltd., and Philippine President Lines Inc., Manila, and Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  5. Josephine Kaszuk v. Bakery and Confectionery Union and Industry International Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kansallis Finance Ltd. v. FernMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  2. ROPT Ltd. Partnership v. KatinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  3. Santos v. Chrysler Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  4. Liberty Square Development Trust v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  5. M.B. Claff, Inc. v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API