James Turner, and Cross-Appellee v. Japan Lines, Ltd., and Philippine President Lines Inc., Manila, and Cross-Appellants
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
On July 27, 1981, we issued an opinion in this case holding that the trial court had improperly granted judgment n.o.v. in favor of the defendants. 1 651 F.2d 1300. Our reversal of the judgment of the district court will result, on remand, in the reinstatement of the jury verdict for the plaintiff rendered on October 6, 1978.
Following the denial of petitions for cer-tiorari by the Supreme Court and before our mandate issued, plaintiff moved that the mandate be amended to include interest from the October 6, 1978 date of the jury verdict until payment by defendants. We granted a stay of…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Briggs v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Robert C. Herd & Co. v. Krawill MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Gorsalitz v. Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Clyde A. Perkins v. Standard Oil Company of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- National Bank of the Commonwealth v. Mechanics' National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. BonjornoSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Handgards, Inc., a Corporation v. Ethicon, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Poleto v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Total Petroleum, Inc. v. Gary J. Davis, D/B/A Gary J. Davis Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Vance v. American Hawaii Cruises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.