Legal Opinion
Pike v. Gunyou
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 13, 1992No. C2-92-734PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOZNIAK, Chief Judge.
This appeal was taken from the dismissal of appellants’ lawsuit for failure to post a $30 million surety bond pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 562.02 (1990). Appellants argue the statute does not apply to their constitutional challenge to the validity of 1991 Minn. Laws ch. 350. In the alternative, appellants argue that the trial court abused its *300discretion by requiring a bond and in establishing the amount of the bond. We affirm.
FACTS
1991 Minn.Laws ch. 350 was signed into law on May 30, 1991. The act authorizes bonds to finance construction of aircraft maintenance and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Visina v. FreemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Arens v. Village of RogersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Gariup v. SternIndiana Supreme Court · 1970
- R. E. Short Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pike v. GunyouSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Novoa v. Secretario de Hacienda del Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto RicoTribunal De Apelaciones De Puerto Rico/Court of Appeals of Puerto Rico · 2009
- Pike v. GunyouCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992