Legal Opinion

Marcus v. Department of Treasury

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 22, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2009-1686PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Granting the Dependants’ Partial Motion to Dismiss

RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

The plaintiff, a pro se litigant, is a former employee of the Department of the Treasury who alleges that she was the victim of racial discrimination. She seeks relief under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq., 42 U.S.C. § 1981, the D.C. Human Rights Act (“DCHRA”), D.C. CODE §§ 2-1401.01 et seq., and various common law tort doctrines. The defendants move for partial dismissal, arguing that the plaintiff may only pursue certain Title VII claims.…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Coulibaly v. KerryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  2. Proctor v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  3. Budik v. AshleyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  4. Smalls v. EmanuelDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  5. Burford v. YellenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API