Legal Opinion

Girten v. National Zinc Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 10, 1916No. 20,542PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Wyandotte district court, division No. 3; HUGH J. Smith, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

West, J.:

The defendant appeals from a lump sum judgment under the workmen’s compensation act. It is claimed that the trial court treated the case as one for damages and not as one for compensation and exercised no discretion as to the matter of periodical payments or lump sum judgment.

The petition alleged that before the suit was brought plaintiff requested defendant both orally and in writing to settle with him for his injuries, which request was refused and that the defendant denied any liability; that the defendant had not made any agreement of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Disbarment of BurnetteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  2. Hess v. ConwaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  3. Haseltine v. NussSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  4. Halverhout v. Southwestern Milling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Hopkins v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  2. Wideman v. FaivreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  3. Odrowski v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  4. Kelly v. Central Union Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  5. Clark v. Milwaukee Mechanics InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API