Legal Opinion

Hess v. Conway

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 14, 1914No. 18,792PublishedCited by 22 opinions

OPINION DENYING A REHEARING. Appeal from Woodson district court; Oscar Foust, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

Petitions for a rehearing have been filed by Harder and by Holmes. In both petitions complaint is made of the refusal of this court to disturb the findings of the district court upon the facts. Not only is the evidence, offered in the district court reargued, but a mass of new evidence is presented here for the first time in an effort to show that the conclusions of the district court concerning the facts should be disapproved. As might be expected if such a practice were tolerated, the witnesses for the appellants carefully filled up the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re the Disbarment of BurnetteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  2. Brewster v. ArnoldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1853
  3. Vail v. DinningSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
  4. Ridge v. MankerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
  5. Caldwell v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Chanute Production Credit Ass'n v. Schicke (In Re Schicke)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  2. State ex rel. Hopkins v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  3. Norfolk & Portsmouth Bar Ass'n v. DrewrySupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
  4. Wideman v. FaivreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  5. Duncan v. DuncanTennessee Supreme Court · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API