Bartholomew v. Walsh
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Mandell, J. Case by Zachariah Bartholomew against S. Francis Walsh and W. B. J. Williams for fraud and deceit in the sale of certain corporate stock. Judgment for plaintiff against defendant Walsh, who brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.
The defendant and appellant- Walsh was sued, jointly with the defendant Williams, by the plaintiff for damages resulting from the sale of worthless stock, the purchase of which, it is claimed, was induced by false representations. It is charged in the declaration that the defendant Williams made the representations as the agent of Walsh, who knew of their falsity and received the proceeds of the sales. The jury found the defendant Walsh guilty, and the defendant Williams not guilty.
It is the.claim of the plaintiff, and he presents evidence tending to prove, that Williams made numerous…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- McGinnis v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906
- Illinois Central Ry. Co. v. Murphy's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. JamesTexas Supreme Court · 1889
- Southern Railway Co. v. HarbinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Beebe v. KnappMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hartzell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Rosenberg v. CyrowskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Harrington v. VelatMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- Essenburg v. RussellMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
- Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.