Legal Opinion

Hartzell v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 16, 1934No. 9954PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Circuit Judge.

Appellant, who will be referred to herein as defendant, was indicted for the violation of section 338, USCA, title 18, section 215 Criminal Code, in an indictment containing fifteen counts. During the trial, counts 8, 9, and 12 were dismissed by the-government, and the defendant was found guilty on the remaining counts.

The scheme to defraud as charged in the indictment consisted in representing that defendant was about to recover from the British government from five to twenty-two billions of dollars in gold, jewels, and real estate; that this vast estate would he…

2Cases cited99 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Holt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Quercia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Ex Parte BainSupreme Court of the United States · 1887

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Hewitt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
  2. State v. HuffmanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Mulloney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1935
  4. United States v. Santos Charles, Jr. And Steven McAninchCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  5. McDonald v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API