Legal Opinion
Sutter Sensible Planning, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 20, 1981No. Civ. 19359PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BLEASE, J.
Sutter Sensible Planning, Inc., and several affected individual property owners appeal from the denial of their petition for a writ of mandate seeking an order directing the Board of Supervisors of Sutter County to vacate its approval of an environmental impact report (EIR) and granting of a conditional use permit to construct a tomato paste processing plant on a parcel of land in the county. Plaintiffs also appeal from the denial of their petition for a declaration that the board violated the “open meeting” requirements of the Ralph M. Brown Act (Gov. Code, § 54950 et seq.)…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Portland Cement Association v. RuckelshausCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Sacramento Newspaper Guild, Local 92 v. Sacramento County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., and the State of New York, Intervenor-Appellant v. Howard H. Callaway, as Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Roberts v. City of PalmdaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Mountain Lion Foundation v. Fish & Game CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Save Our Peninsula Committee v. Monterey County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Regents of University of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.