Legal Opinion

Ostrom v. City of San Antonio

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1901No. 1012PublishedCited by 57 opinions

Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Fourth District, in an appeal from Bexar County. Sarah F. Ostrom sued the city of San Antonio, and judgment being given for defendant, plaintiff appealed, and on affirmance obtained writ of error.

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Associate Justice.

Sarah F. Ostrom sued the city of San Antonio in the court .of the Thirty-seventh District, alleging in substance that in that court on the 24th day of' November, 1897, she recovered a judgment against the city which established her title to all of lots 12 and 13, district 1, range 3, of the said city, and that the said court entered up a judgment enjoining and prohibiting the city of San Antonio from thereafter using any part of the said lots as a public highway, road, or street. That from and after the day the said decree was entered to the time of filing the suit on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Galveston v. PosnainskyTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Love v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  3. Kuehn v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  4. City of Fort Worth v. CrawfordTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Chautauque County Bank v. RisleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1859

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. QuinonesTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  2. City of Amarillo v. WareTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Scibilia v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Hanks v. City of Port ArthurTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Hanks v. City of Port ArthurTexas Supreme Court · 1932

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API