Denny's, Inc. v. Chicago Insurance
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TURNER, P. J.
I. Introduction
This case presents the question whether two excess insurers were required to provide coverage in the place of an insolvent underlying insurer. The trial court granted summary judgment pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 437c in favor of the two excess insurers. The trial court found that (1) the excess insurance policies were “not ambiguous with respect to assumption of the risk of an underlying insurer’s insolvency or inability to pay” and (2) the excess insurance policies, through incorporation of the consistent terms and conditions of the…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Leal v. Holy Spirit Ass'n for Unification of World ChristianityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Reserve Insurance Co. v. PisciottaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Tiernan v. Trustees of California State University and CollegesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Johnston v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Bell v. Industrial Vangas, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Louisiana Ins. Guar. Ass'n v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Qualcomm, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, LondonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- North American Capacity Insurance v. Claremont Liability InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Playtex FP, Inc. v. Columbia Casualty Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1992
- Wells Fargo Bank v. California Insurance Guarantee Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.