Legal Opinion

Weedon v. Weedon

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 13, 1949No. Civ. 16854, 16950PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

On the cross-complaint of Mrs. Weedon, an interlocutory decree of divorce was entered February 3, 1943. Pursuant to a “Property Settlement Agreement” executed by the couple two months prior to the decree, the court ordered appellant to pay his wife “for her support and maintenance the sum of . . . $66.67 per month . . . subject to all the terms ... in paragraph 7 of said property settlement agreement . . incorporated herein by reference. ’ ’ After providing for the payment of support money for respondent and the children the contract provides that appellant’s obligations to pay the support…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Estate of RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Leupe v. LeupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Hough v. HoughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Adams v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Puckett v. PuckettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dexter v. DexterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Codorniz v. CodornizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Yarus v. YarusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Pearman v. PearmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Kelley v. KelleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API