Legal Opinion
City of Stamford v. Kovac
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 8, 1992No. 10693PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
The defendants Milivoje Kovac and Sylvester Beserminje appeal from the trial court’s order requiring them to perform substantial restorative acts on their property. They present two issues on appeal: “(1) Is the trial court’s ‘order granting preliminary injunction’ dated April 1,1991, a ‘permanent’ order, a final judgment, which is immediately appealable? (2) Does the trial court’s order granting ‘preliminary’ injunction dated April 1,1991, violate the due process clauses of the constitution[s] of the United States and state of Connecticut?” We reverse the order of the trial court.
The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Conservation Commission v. PriceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Olcott v. PendletonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Laurel Park, Inc. v. PacSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Doublewal Corp. v. ToffolonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- United States v. Cumberland Farms of Connecticut, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of Stamford v. KovacSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Clinton v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Grovenburg v. Rustle Meadow Associates, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Town of Southington v. PierceConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- City of Stamford v. KovacSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.