Legal Opinion
Security Management Corp. v. Baltimore County
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided March 31, 1995No. 929PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILNER, Chief Judge.
Appellant is upset that its property, located in the Loch Raven watershed in Baltimore County, is included in the county’s RC-4 resource conservation zone and therefore is limited in its development potential. It claims that inclusion of its property in that zone is unconstitutional for a variety of reasons. We find no merit to its assertions and shall therefore affirm the judgment of the Circuit Court for Baltimore County dismissing its complaint.
THE COUNTY ZONING LAW
Pursuant to the Constitutional and statutory authority vest-' ed in it as a chartered county, Baltimore…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Keystone Bituminous Coal Assn. v. DeBenedictisSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People's Counsel v. SurinaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Maryland Reclamation Associates, Inc. v. Harford CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Committee for Responsible Development on 25th Street v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Oltman v. Maryland State Board of PhysiciansCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Md. Reclamation v. Harford Cty.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.