Legal Opinion

Nicholson v. Herman

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided January 27, 1999No. 04-98-00450-CVPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHIL HARDBERGER, Chief Justice.

Carlyn Nicholson appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Herman and Mary Smith in this premises liability action. In two points of error, Nicholson complains that the trial court erred in not striking certain summary judgment evidence and also erred by granting the Smiths’ motion for summary judgment. We affirm the trial court’s grant of summary judgment.

I

In early to mid-December of 1994, Thomas and Carlyn Nicholson rented a space at Choke Canyon RV Park, a recreational park owned by the Smiths, with the intent to spend the winter…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Kindred v. Con/Chem, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
  4. American Tobacco Co., Inc. v. GrinnellTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Montgomery v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1984

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Garcia v. Cross, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2000
  2. Union Pacific Railroad Company v. William NamiTexas Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Hollywood Park Humane Society v. Town of Hollywood Park, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2008
  4. St. Joseph's Hosp. v. CowartDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  5. Belhumeur v. ZilmSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API