Legal Opinion

Union Pacific Railroad Company v. William Nami

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 2016No. 14-0901PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hecht

delivered .the opinion of the Court, in which

JUSTICE GREEN, JUSTICE WILLETT, JUSTICE GUZMAN, , JUSTICE LEHRMANN, JUSTICE BOYD, JUSTICE DEVINE, and JUSTICE BROWN joined. ■

A railroad employee who contracted West Nile virus' from a mosquito bite contends that his employer is liable for damages under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (“FELA”),1’ which requires railroads to provide their employees reasonably safe places to work. FELA liability is generally based on common-law negligence principles. One well-established principle, part of the doctrine of ferae naturae, limits a property owner’s…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Consolidated Rail Corporation v. GottshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway v. BuellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Wilkerson v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Randy Austin v. Kroger Texas, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2015

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ernest Gonzales v. Thorndale Cooperative Gin and Grain Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2019
  2. Staats v. Vintner's Golf Club, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. Hill v. Mo. Dep't of ConservationSupreme Court of Missouri · 2018
  4. Henry McCall v. Homer Hillis, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2018
  5. Cadena Comercial USA Corp. D/B/A Oxxo v. Texas Alcoholic Beverage CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 2017

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API