Legal Opinion

State v. Ramey

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 2012No. 2011-0597PublishedCited by 94 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, C.J.

{¶ 1} The issue presented in this appeal is whether the filing of a pretrial motion to suppress by a co-defendant automatically tolls the time within which a defendant must be brought to trial. We hold that it does not. Accordingly, we reverse the court of appeals’ judgment. And for the reasons explained herein, we remand this case to the court of appeals to determine whether the setting of the trial date beyond the statutory time period was reasonable, as required by R.C. 2945.72(H).

Facts and Procedural History

{¶ 2} On October 7, 2009, Keith Ramey and Jonathan Keeton were arrested for…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State v. SingerOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. KingOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. O'BrienOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. MincyOhio Supreme Court · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by94 opinions

  1. State v. GartrellOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. State v. Martin (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  3. State v. VasquezOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. State v. CarrOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. State v. KnottOhio Court of Appeals · 2024

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API