Legal Opinion

Welsh v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 27, 1931PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.

There is no allegation in the complaint in this action, nor was there evidence at the trial tending to show that plaintiff was totally and permanently disabled as defined in section 68 of the constitution and by-laws of defendant. Plaintiff has not suffered an amputation or severance of an entire hand at or above the wrist joint, or an amputation or severance of air entire foot at or above the ankle joint; he has not suffered the loss of sight of one or of both eyes, nor has he arrived at the age of 70 years. He has not become totally and permanently disabled as defined in section 68.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Floars v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  2. Clements v. Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. Britton v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Burton v. Life & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  5. Graham v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Britton v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  2. Moore v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  3. Gabrell v. Grand Lodge, Brotherhood of Railway TrainmenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  4. Loos v. Brotherhood of Railroad TrainmenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1936
  5. Ellis v. Grand Lodge, Brotherhood of R. R. TrainmenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API